21 septembre 2014

Le Canada en guerre contre la science

Quelle honte:

Canada's War on Science Brings Us International Shame

A push to prioritize economic gains over basic research is endangering science and academic freedom in countries around the world, according to a new report published by a leading researchers union, the French National Trade Union of Scientific Researchers (SNCS-FSU).

The group surveyed higher education and research unions in 12 countries including France, Argentina, Canada, Denmark, Italy, Portugal, Russia, Senegal, Serbia, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S.

The research union found governments internationally are pushing for policies "geared towards innovation in order to spur consumption and competitiveness," according to Patrick Monfort, secretary-general of the SNCS-FSU. "Budget cuts are often blamed for our problems," he said, "but they are only part of the picture."

Monfort told the prestigious journal Nature that scientists in Canada have been particularly hard hit, not only by broad funding cuts, but contentious communications protocols that prevent their freedom of expression.

The new French-language report mentions Environment Canada scientist David Tarasick, who was prevented from speaking about his research on the ozone layer as well as Department of Fisheries and Oceans scientist Kristi Miller, who was prevented from speaking with the media about her research into declining salmon stocks.

The report also notes Natural Resources Canada scientist Scott Dallimore who was not allowed to speak with media about a flood that occurred 13,000 years ago without receiving ministerial approval.

The turn to applied research and science that directly benefits the economy threatens the job security of professional scientists, concludes the new report. The problem is affecting the international scientific community to such an extent the group will call for an international science campaign at their upcoming Higher Education and Research Conference this November.

Canada's so-called "War on Science" has made international headlines, especially after deep funding cuts led to the closure of some of Canada's most important research centres. Thousands of federal scientists from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans as well as Environment Canada have lost their jobs as a result of the cuts.

Since 2006 the Harper government has introduced strict communications procedures that prevent scientists from speaking freely about -- and at times even publishing -- their research. Federal scientists are required to gain upper-level bureaucratic approval before they speak with journalists about their work, leading the international scientific community to call for the "unmuzzling" of Canada's scientists.

A report last year from the University of Victoria's Environmental Law Centre catalogued numerous instances of muzzling and led to an investigation by Canada's information commissioner Suzanne Legault. That investigation is on-going.

Another report, released by the Professional Institute for the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC), released in October 2013 found 37 per cent of federal researchers and scientists felt that within the last five years they were directly prevented from sharing their expertise with the public or media.

Nearly 25 per cent said they were forced to by government officials to modify their research for non-scientific reasons.

(...) "All over Canada right now scientists are having their funding pulled," she said, "especially scientists who are speaking about climate change."

"I rely on the experts in this world, experts like scientists and journalists, to give me the information to help guide me, to help me guide the government and I think that circle is the way democracy is supposed to work," she said.

3 commentaires:

F a dit...

" Federal scientists are required to gain upper-level bureaucratic approval before they speak with journalists about their work..."

Et c'est peu dire! Il peut y avoir jusqu'à NEUF  niveau de bureaucratie à passer pour pouvoir communiquer ses recherches. C'est complètement dingue et surtout à l'encontre des buts premiers de la science.


Prof Solitaire a dit...

Qu'est-ce que ça prend pour faire un scandale au Canada anglais?

Est-ce qu'il y a quelque chose qui soulève la colère canadienne?

À part Rob Ford?

Et encore là...

Hénèm a dit...

"La priorité de notre gouvernement est l'économie"

Sauf que sans recherche fondamentale non dirigée, pas de théories de physique quantique, développées dans les années 1920. De nos jours, c'est environ un tiers de l'économie de la planète qui repose sur l'échange d'information en temps réel, et ça va pas aller en diminuant!

Mais allez expliquer à un conservateur que votre recherche pourrait être utile juste dans 100 ans...